Editorial, Issue 137

Curved buildingsRadstats’ annual conference took place at Manchester Metroplitan University on the 1st of March 2025, and we thank all of those involved in its organisation, as well as those who presented and participated in the discussion. There were excellent papers on the history of statistics in Manchester, the gaps between data and the lived experience of care leavers, the use of statistics in the Lucy Letby murder case, the statistics on the representation of Muslims on the silver screen, and the rise and fall of class voting in Britain, amongst others. We hope to publish some of these contributions in a
forthcoming issue.

A lot has happened since the 2025 conference. Radstats lost a dear friend and longstanding activist in John Bibby, who passed away on the 15th of May. John has made many notable contributions to radical statistics. His thoughtful and inspiring talk at this years’ conference about Radstats’ legacy and its 50th anniversary was
delivered remotely, as he was already unwell at the time. John’s kindness and energy will be greatly missed in our community. This issue includes an obituary to John, provided by Dave Drew, Jeff Evans and Ludi Simpson, and we welcome contributions and ideas around commemorating John further in future issues. Also, in this issue we have two articles that examine issues of sampling adequacy and how we may respond to them. Firstly, Peter Lynn, poses the question, why are some people missing from UK
surveys? Rather than seeking to quantify the extent of under-representation or evaluate the impact on survey estimates, Lynn sets forth a framework for exploring the problem, identifying the groups of interest, understanding the mechanisms that lead to under-
counting or exclusion and evaluating methods to reduce under-coverage in future surveys.

Janet C. Bowstead, in a complementary piece, focuses on the exclusion from national sample surveys of two ‘residentially unsettled’ populations, specifically women on the move to escape domestic violence, and prisoners in England and Wales. Bowstead
considers the opportunities – and challenges of trying to access –  service administrative data, illustrating her argument with examples from a variety of projects.

Finally, Frank Houghton explores the introduction of the Gambling Regulation Act in Ireland in 2024, examining concerns in terms of liberalisation, and making the case that the rhetoric of gambling regulation is belied by the opacity and confusion surrounding the data pertaining to that regulation (for example, underage gambling
convictions).

In terms of the wider world (but also our own workplaces), the last couple of months also saw the further demise of UK Higher Education, with entire degree programmes closed, thousands across the sector losing their jobs, and spiralling workloads for those left. The crisis is felt deeply by the editorial team as several of its members work in institutions that have announced cuts and redundancies. It is caused almost entirely by longstanding mismanagement by Universities’ senior leaderships and by the government’s failure to act. We appear to be witnessing the death of UK Higher Education. The loss will do unspeakable harm to the economy and will be felt by generations to come. Yet, the crisis is avoidable, and Universities’ funding model can be fixed if those who hold political power will it. There is some hope in the trade union movement. UCU branches across the country, such as Bradford, Cardiff, Dundee, Durham, Edinburgh, Sheffield Hallam have voted to take, or have already taken, strike action. The industrial action is having successes. UCU branches in Liverpool, and most recently in Dundee and Newcastle have won – compulsory redundancies were scrapped as a result and Dundee has secured a financial bailout by the Scottish government. Lancaster, where senior management wants to be rid of a quarter of
the workforce, will soon be in dispute. Sheffield Hallam is entering its third dispute in 12 months.

Across the pond, the Trump administration continues to attack Universities, public health, civil servants and, most acutely, immigrant communities, which are amongst the most vulnerable. We would welcome contributions on all of these topics (the HE crisis,
trade union action, populism, austerity cuts) and more, both as presentations to the 2026 conference that will take place in London, and/or as papers to this journal. Radical statistics is a crucial endeavour now more than ever, as we continue to count social harms, scrutinise data and speak truth to power.

Read Issue 137 (fully open access) now.

Steffi Doebler, Lancaster University
Bob Jeffery and Sean Demack, Sheffield Hallam University
Irina Motoc, University of Amsterdam

Radical Statistics’ 2025 Conference Call for Papers and Posters!

Powerful fists and numbers released from cage

DigitalVision Vectors via Getty

VENUE: Manchester Metropolitan University
DATES: Saturday, 1 March from 9:30 to 5:00
SOCIALS: Friday from 5 pm onward, & an optional Saturday evening dinner. TBA.
WALKABOUT: a guided Peace Walk will occur on Sunday morning. TBA.

DETAILS: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/radical
statistics-50th-anniversary-conference-tickets-1063835794499
Friday 28 Feb., University Place room Room 2.217, step-free access at
University of Manchester, M13 PL. Join us for an informal get-together
with drinks & nibbles at 5 -7 pm.
Saturday 1 March 2025, Conference sessions, Grosvenor East Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cavendish Street Manchester M15 6BG (Taxis come to the back side please).

POSTER COMPETITION: Those who enter the general poster competition must use the above link to submit a Poster Proposal. Registration: £55, £10 low income, students are welcome to join for free (use the volunteer registration), but for any category, further donations are very welcome. Register using Eventbrite. Tickets are on sale now. Thank you! In Solidarity, on behalf of the entire Radical Statistics team.

Prof. Wendy Olsen

University of Manchester
Contact is wendy.olsen@manchester.ac.uk

Issue 136 Editorial Introduction: Decolonising Statistics

Falcoln and map of BritainAs we put the final touches to this special issue we just learned of the re-election of Donald Trump as President of the USA. His campaign was to a significant degree fueled by xenophobic and racist hate, with promises of launching ‘the largest deportation program in American history’ while some of his allies poured vitriol over the inhabitants of Puerto Rico, a US colonial possession. For the Democrats’ part, had Kamala Harris been elected we may have heard a softer tone, but she had also backed the increasing securitisation of the US’ southern border. Moreover, the Democrats active financing and backing of the ongoing genocide in Gaza also cost Harris support.

To say nothing of the UK’s own ‘racist riots’ in July and August of this year, whipped up by far-right agitators, but enabled by the mainstreaming of vitriol directed at migrants, many of them fleeing neo-colonial conflicts in which Britain is an active participant.

Race, racialisation and racism clearly matter and the ‘problem of the colour line’ is as significant to the 21st century as W E B Dubois presciently predicted it would for the 20th. As academics and activists, it is incumbent upon us to challenge contemporary racism, and an important component of this is excavating and expunging racism within our own discipline. Given the legacy of statistics and statisticians in transforming race from a social construction to a pseudo-scientific fact, one could argue we have a particular obligation to the work of decolonising.

But this is not simply a question of historical curiosity, there are contemporary forms of data colonialism that to this day play a pernicious role in maintaining social hierarchies in and between the Global South and the coloniser’s heartlands. We hope that this special issue, based on a panel from the 2024 Radstats conference, is the beginning of a much larger conversation.

Bob Jeffery and Sean Demack, Sheffield Hallam University
Steffi Doebler, Lancaster University

2024 Annual Conference Programme Announced

The Radical Statistics Conference, Statistics to Inform Radical Change, will be held in central London on 24th February, 2024, followed by the Annual General Meeting – all welcome! Register in advance or on the door.

Cartoon men and women with statistical graphs

Topics

  1. Education
  2. Artificial Intelligence
  3. Decolonialising quantitative methods
  4. The uncounted part I: Surveys in the UK and Ukraine
  5. The uncounted part II: Unsettled populations and data
  6. Invisibilised in India

With lunch and social events – join us!

Issue 135

Contents of this Issue

Moon with issue numberThere are three papers in issue 135. John Bibby’s appreciation of a long-standing Radical Statistics member and activist; Janet Shapiro. This is followed by a powerful empirical paper by Frank Houghton et al, on data suppression around maternal mortality in Idaho, USA.  Finally, Simeon Scott and Mark Dunkerley present a critical examination of the interplay between money, markets and inequality, a paper they first presented at the Sheffield Radical Statistics conference in March 2023.

RadStats Journal / Newsletter

The Radical Statistics editorial team has expanded but is still in search of people to help in terms of reviewing submitted articles or interesting books. The future of the RadStats journal is dependent on submissions from members and other interested parties. Since the Sheffield conference, we have seen a reasonable upturn in the number of papers submitted, and hope that this trend continues. If you have written something that you think would interest Radical Statistics, please consider submitting.

Getting Involved

The RadStats group is as strong as its membership and we welcome offers of help.  If you are interested in becoming involved with the journal, a future conference or event (RadStats turns 50 in 2024) or have other ideas to advance the Radical Statistics aim of building a more free, democratic, and egalitarian society, please contact editors@radstats.org.uk.

RadStats are particularly concerned about

  • Mystifying use of technical language to disguise social problems
  • Lack of control by the community over what & how statistical investigations are conducted and interpreted.
  • Power structures within which statistical and research workers are employed.
  • Fragmentation of social problems into specialist fields, obscuring connectedness.

“We believe that statistics can be used to support radical campaigns for progressive social change. Statistics should inform, not drive policies. Social problems should not be disguised by technical language.”

Administrative Issues

Please make sure you have updated your subscription, or make a donation! – by going to www.radstats.org.uk/membership/ where you can pay by cheque, standing order or PayPal.

Editorial Team (editors@radstats.org.uk)

Sean DEMACK, Bob JEFFERY

Please email if interested in joining this team.

Review Editor

Irina MOTOC

Introduction and Editorial, Issue 134 (with memorial to Roy Carr-Hill)

Contents of this Issue

There is one poem, three papers and one book review in this issue.  In addition to a poem for and paper from Roy Carr-Hill (see below), Zohreen Badruddin worked with Diana Kornbrot to convert Diana’s RadStats conference paper on the infrastructure needed for Universal Basic Income (UBI) into the one published here. This is followed by a paper by Sean Demack on HE equality analyses involving ethnicity which reveals several (onion) layers of problematic statistical practice. Finally, Irina Motoc reviews a book on data visualization by Maarten Boers.

Roy Carr-Hill 1943-1922

Roy Carr-HillA founding member of Radical Statistics and, for the last decade, lead editor of this RadStats journal / newsletter, Roy died suddenly in November 2022. Family and friends gathered to remember Roy at a humanist funeral in York crematorium on a frozen Friday 9th December. The music of Paul Simon, Bob Marley and from The Blues Brothers accompanied moving memories of Roy’s life from four daughters and a grandson (and others later in The Woodman pub). To mark the death of Roy, this issue includes the John Dryden poem that was read at his funeral and a re-print of one of his RadStats articles in which he wryly summarised the rich and radical life he had lived up to 1999 when it was first published (RadStats Issue 71). I assume that Roy celebrated his 16th election of not voting in 2019!

RadStats Journal / Newsletter

For the last few years, I have helped Roy to put this journal / newsletter together.  Irina Motoc joined us more recently to focus on increasing the volume of book reviews submitted & published.  With the help of Eileen Magnello (copy editor) and Alistair Cairns (administrator), we have published 3-4 editions of the journal each year. The future of the RadStats journal is dependent on submissions from members and other interested parties. In addition to articles (and other submissions), if you are interested in becoming part of the editorial team, please contact us using the details below.

Radical Statistics Conference 2023

The conference [was] held on March 25th in Sheffield and the first in person RadStats event for three years. The conference has a broad theme of ‘Radical Statistics in an Age of Uncertainty’ and will include presentations on hidden unemployment, civic statistics, and pupil segregation. Please visit https://www.radstats.org.uk/conference/Sheffield2023/ for more detail.

Getting Involved

The RadStats group is as strong as its membership and we welcome offers of help. If you are interested in becoming involved with the journal, a future conference or event or other ideas to advance the Radical Statistics aim of building a more free, democratic, and egalitarian society, please contact editors@radstats.org.uk.

RadStats are particularly concerned about

  • Mystifying use of technical language to disguise social problems.
  • Lack of control by the community over what & how statistical investigations are conducted and interpreted.
  • Power structures within which statistical and research workers are employed.
  • Fragmentation of social problems into specialist fields, obscuring connectedness.

“We believe that statistics can be used to support radical campaigns for progressive social change.  Statistics should inform, not drive policies.  Social problems should not be disguised by technical language.”

We currently have no proposed articles for the next issue (RS 135); We encourage presenters at the conference in Sheffield to submit an article for consideration. Our review editor, Irina Motoc has several books for review, and is seeking volunteers!

Administrative Issues

Please make sure you have updated your subscription, or make a donation! – by going to www.radstats.org.uk/membership/ where you can pay by cheque, standing order, PayPal – or by filling in your details on page 45.

Editorial Team (editors@radstats.org.uk)

Sean DEMACK

Please email if interested in joining this team.

Review Editor

Irina MOTOC (irinamotoc@gmx.com)

What does AI ‘think’ of Radical Statistics?

Guest Author: John Bibby

I was doodling with WordPress the other day and noted that it has a new option – “AI paragraph (experimental)”.  Another new option is “AI image (experimental)”. I tried the first option and put “Radical Statistics” as the prompt for an experimental paragraph. After ten seconds, this is what it gave me:

Radical Statistics is a field of study that aims to challenge the status quo and traditional methods of gathering and interpreting data. It is about recognizing the power dynamics that affect the collection of statistics and understanding the impact that data can have on policy decisions and social justice.

At its core, Radical Statistics is about questioning the data that is presented to us and demanding transparency and accountability from those who collect it. It is about recognizing the biases and assumptions that can be hidden in supposedly objective measurements and understanding how these can perpetuate inequality and discrimination.

One key aspect of Radical Statistics is the recognition that data cannot be divorced from the context in which it is collected. It is about recognizing the history and power dynamics that have shaped the way in which data is collected and interpreted, and working to ensure that these do not perpetuate systemic inequalities.

Radical Statistics also recognizes the role that data can play in social change. By providing accurate and meaningful data, we can challenge dominant narratives and create more just and equitable societies. It is about using data as a tool for social change rather than simply accepting it as an objective truth.

Ultimately, Radical Statistics is about changing the way we think about data and its role in society. It is about recognizing the power that data can have and working to ensure that this power is used for good. By challenging traditional methods of gathering and interpreting data, we can create a more just and equitable world for all.

Actually I felt it was rather good. However, surprisingly, it failed to mention the brilliant Radical Statistics organisation. I wonder if that is because its algorithm tells it not to?

JOHN

Editorial, Issue 133

Contents of this Issue
In this, relatively shortballoons with smileys, issue we have two very interesting articles. The first by Chris Tofallis, Thomas Dunk and Neil Spencer from Hertfohttp://journal/issue133rdshire, after a forensic analysis of what MPs should be doing, focuses on constructing a ‘League Table’ of MPs performance in Parliament based on speeches made, written questions submitted and votes attended. The second by Manjinder Jagdev is another forensic examination of how racism permeated the national curricula for primary and secondary schools and how to get rid of it. Because of a an internal mix-up, we have to profusely apologise to both sets of authors, as these articles should have been in RSN 132. Nevertheless, we think that both articles, and especially the first, will have increased interest because of the current chaos in the British government.

Prospects for RSN 134
We are in the very rare position of having two papers already for RSN134 which will come out before the Sheffield Conference in February, one of them following on from the virtual conference that was hosted by the Literary and Philosophical Society of Newcastle upon Tyne on the theme of ‘Taxing Wealth, Reducing Inequality’, held on Saturday 26th February. We- the editors – will be pursuing the other presenters at that conference relentlessly in the next couple of weeks. Our new Review Editor, Irina Motoc, also has several books for review, and is looking for volunteers.

Administrative Issues
Please make sure you have updated your subscription, or make a donation! – by going  to www.radstats.org.uk/membership/ where you can pay by cheque, standing order, PayPal – see p.47.

Editors
Roy CARR-HILL
Sean DEMACK
Review Editor
Irina MOTOC