Radical Statistics Issue 101 (2010) – Editorial

Welcome to Radical Statistics Issue 101. The editors thank authors for the contributions in this miscellaneous issue; there is no specific theme but you will find the usual critical analysis and comment.

Fernando De Maio revisits the earlier writings of Engels and Virchow, who identified social conditions as the major determinants of health and argued strongly for the relief of poverty and improved living conditions. He notes the link with current researchers; they may not be preaching revolution but are still arguing for policy change in order to reduce health inequalities.

Here in the UK, various systems of voting are being compared for effective voter representation, so the article by Don Kerr and Hugh Mellon explaining the Canadian system is topical. They question whether the system is robust in the face of increasing population drift to the cities in Canada. A comment follows by Ludi Simpson, who has written on immigration and population growth in issues 99 & 100. Ludi doubts whether population drift to cities will lead to disproportionate representation in the UK.

The next issue, expected to be out before the end of the summer, will present articles from the 2010 Annual Conference – ‘Whose Statistics?’. However, because it was presented promptly, Harvey Goldstein’s article is included here together with two commentaries on the conference.

Harvey argues that statisticians should use the most powerful techniques available, particularly for hierarchical systems that display complexity; he claims that it is unprofessional for statisticians to condone drawing conclusions from an overly simplistic analysis. He justifies the need for an ethical approach by quoting discussions on the validity of school league tables.

Two contributors, Christian Hennig and John Urquhart, present their own personal views on the 2010 annual conference and substance of the debate. We also have book reviews by Alex Lea and Jane Galbraith. Contributions of this sort are very welcome and often stimulate further discussion. Please inundate the editors with your writings!

Janet Shapiro
Jane Galbraith
Bob Sanders
editors@radstats.org.uk

Radstats 2011 Conference: Cuts & Corporations

All are welcome at Radical Statistics conference: ‘Cuts and Corporations’
Saturday, February 26th 2011, Leeds.

– Alan Franco of Tameside Council, Jay Ginn and Howard Reed on statistics of the cuts and their impact.
– Stuart Parkinson of Scientists for Global Responsibility on corporate influence on science and technology
– Peter Wilmshurst on libel laws on science
– Victoria Johnson of the New Economics Foundation on redefining wealth and progress
– Workshops and lots, lots more

The conference fee is minimal, to encourage all interested in the politics of statistics, whether professional or campaigning or from personal interest.

Full programme and booking form at https://www.radstats.org.uk/conf2011/index.htm

Please circulate to colleagues, friends, networks and lists. Please print the programme to display at work.